View: Direct cash transfer is not the vaccine for reviving GDP. It’s not even anti-viral remdesivir
Agencies
Economists like Raghuram Rajan, Abhijit V Banerjee and Manmohan Singh, as well as politicians like P Chidambaram and Yogendra Yadav, have been advocating more cash be put in the hands of people. But they haven’t answered ‘How?’, ‘How much?’, and ‘At what cost?’
Synopsis
Economists like Raghuram Rajan, Abhijit V Banerjee and Manmohan Singh, as well as politicians like P Chidambaram and Yogendra Yadav, have been advocating more cash be put in the hands of people. But they haven’t answered ‘How?’, ‘How much?’, and ‘At what cost?’ What is the magic fiscal deficit number appropriate for balancing the macro consequences of direct cash transfers (DCTs)?
By , ET CONTRIBUTORS
6 mins read, Last Updated:
If simply printing more money and distributing cash would have made GDP rocket, then Robert Mugabe would be the world’s best Keynesian economist, and Zimbabwe the GDP king. John Maynard Keynes did advocate the printing of money in a ‘depression’ economy to create demand that would, in turn, engender more investments, and thereby enable the ‘virtuous cycle’ to kick in. If similar cash infusion is done today, it is highly unlikely it would revive
To Read the Full Story, Become an ET Prime Member
Access the exclusive Economic Times stories, Editorial and Expert opinion
Already a Member? Sign In now
Why
Sharp Insight-rich, Indepth stories across 20+ sectors
Access the exclusive Economic Times stories, Editorial and Expert opinion
- Clean experience with
Minimal Ads - Comment & Engage with ET Prime community
- Exclusive invites to Virtual Events with Industry Leaders
- A trusted team of Journalists & Analysts who can best filter signal from noise